state of the reproductive union
Oct. 11th, 2006 05:09 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I don't think I posted about this at the time, but I probably should have. Regardless, some of you were probably aware of the problems that blogger BB at the Den of the Biting Beaver (who lives in Ohio) had when she tried to get emergency contraception. She eventually did get her hands on Plan B, but worried that the delay would interfere with the drug's efficacy. And it turns out she worried with cause, because now she writes that the EC failed.
She deserves mad props for being willing to publish her experiences on her blog. She obviously set herself up for a great deal of hate-mail, in all possible forms. And it's worth signal-boosting this story, I think, so that people know what kinds of problems women are still facing, even though the FDA approved Plan B.
I got this story from Broadsheet on Salon.com. They provide a pretty good summary of the situation. I advise going there for details.
She deserves mad props for being willing to publish her experiences on her blog. She obviously set herself up for a great deal of hate-mail, in all possible forms. And it's worth signal-boosting this story, I think, so that people know what kinds of problems women are still facing, even though the FDA approved Plan B.
I got this story from Broadsheet on Salon.com. They provide a pretty good summary of the situation. I advise going there for details.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-11 11:44 pm (UTC)I only read the salon.com article, so perhaps I misjudged BB's comments about the fetus.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-12 12:13 am (UTC)As for the other, it's kind of a minor inconvenience to have to drive to the drug store at night, right? Beyond that, I think that inconveniencing irresponsible people isn't a good enough reason for inconveniencing the responsible people along with them. Also, as you say, irresponsible people probably don't need any help to have unsafe sex, they're probably already doing it.
Besides, we all fall somewhere in between responsible and irresponsible anyways. Nobody's consistent.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-12 12:31 am (UTC)That's you judging what's irresponsible, which leads to the same slippery slope as any other basis for dictating who should have access. If you want people to avoid sex, possible STDs and emotional fallout are disincentives enough - the threat of unwanted pregnancy is unnecessary.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-12 01:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-12 01:44 am (UTC)Not all unprotected sex is irresponsible. (If you mean "sex without contraception" rather than "unprotected sex," I don't have any problem with it.) The idea that people have to be threatened with punishment in order to make good decisions is troubling.