(no subject)

Wow. More wow.

Then I think about the chances of that verdict being handed down in this country, and it harshes my squee.

(no subject)

Follow-up to previous post:

Matt Yglesias takes issue with the idea that the ruling in South Africa is a good idea.

I understand the arguments for free speech, and sympathize with them to a certain extent, but speech can cause actual physical harm. I really believe this. So where does one draw the line? I do not have a problem with South Africa continuing to draw it where they just drew it.