![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Follow-up to previous post:
Matt Yglesias takes issue with the idea that the ruling in South Africa is a good idea.
I understand the arguments for free speech, and sympathize with them to a certain extent, but speech can cause actual physical harm. I really believe this. So where does one draw the line? I do not have a problem with South Africa continuing to draw it where they just drew it.
Matt Yglesias takes issue with the idea that the ruling in South Africa is a good idea.
I understand the arguments for free speech, and sympathize with them to a certain extent, but speech can cause actual physical harm. I really believe this. So where does one draw the line? I do not have a problem with South Africa continuing to draw it where they just drew it.